Constitutional Legacies and Strategic Dependence: The U.S. Role in Shaping Japan’s and Kosovo’s Security Policy

Session

Political Sciences

Description

Japan’s diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific reflects a continuous effort to balance its enduring security dependence on the United States with the growing challenges posed by China’s regional assertiveness. This balance is rooted in Japan’s postwar constitutional framework, particularly Article 9, which institutionalized pacifism and imposed legal restrictions on the use of military force. These provisions, established under strong American guidance during the occupation, continue to shape Japan’s regional security behavior, alliance management, and participation in collective defense. Similarly, the United States played a decisive role in drafting Kosovo’s 2008 Constitution, where Article 126 defines the structure of the Kosovo Security Force and embeds its defense policy within Western, U.S.-backed frameworks. By examining these two U.S.-influenced constitutional models, this study compares how Japan and Kosovo operate within distinct yet parallel geopolitical contexts-Japan in the Indo-Pacific and Kosovo in the Euro-Atlantic region. Both states exemplify how constitutional design, alliance commitments, and postwar reconstruction have produced enduring patterns of strategic dependence. Despite differences in scale and context, each case demonstrates how U.S. constitutional and security influence has constrained full autonomy while ensuring alignment with broader American and allied interests. Although both Japan and Kosovo have introduced legislative revisions aimed at strengthening their defense capacities and expanding their roles in regional security, they continue to face significant external threats and strategic vulnerabilities. The research concludes that these legacies persist in defining both nations’ diplomatic behavior, security engagement, and capacity to navigate an increasingly polarized international environment.

Keywords:

Security policy; Constitutions, Diplomacy, Indo-Pacific, Euro-Atlantic, Postwar reconstruction

Proceedings Editor

Edmond Hajrizi

ISBN

978-9951-982-41-2

Location

UBT Lipjan, Kosovo

Start Date

25-10-2025 9:00 AM

End Date

26-10-2025 6:00 PM

DOI

10.33107/ubt-ic.2025.333

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Oct 25th, 9:00 AM Oct 26th, 6:00 PM

Constitutional Legacies and Strategic Dependence: The U.S. Role in Shaping Japan’s and Kosovo’s Security Policy

UBT Lipjan, Kosovo

Japan’s diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific reflects a continuous effort to balance its enduring security dependence on the United States with the growing challenges posed by China’s regional assertiveness. This balance is rooted in Japan’s postwar constitutional framework, particularly Article 9, which institutionalized pacifism and imposed legal restrictions on the use of military force. These provisions, established under strong American guidance during the occupation, continue to shape Japan’s regional security behavior, alliance management, and participation in collective defense. Similarly, the United States played a decisive role in drafting Kosovo’s 2008 Constitution, where Article 126 defines the structure of the Kosovo Security Force and embeds its defense policy within Western, U.S.-backed frameworks. By examining these two U.S.-influenced constitutional models, this study compares how Japan and Kosovo operate within distinct yet parallel geopolitical contexts-Japan in the Indo-Pacific and Kosovo in the Euro-Atlantic region. Both states exemplify how constitutional design, alliance commitments, and postwar reconstruction have produced enduring patterns of strategic dependence. Despite differences in scale and context, each case demonstrates how U.S. constitutional and security influence has constrained full autonomy while ensuring alignment with broader American and allied interests. Although both Japan and Kosovo have introduced legislative revisions aimed at strengthening their defense capacities and expanding their roles in regional security, they continue to face significant external threats and strategic vulnerabilities. The research concludes that these legacies persist in defining both nations’ diplomatic behavior, security engagement, and capacity to navigate an increasingly polarized international environment.