Comparative study of the mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology of fly ash and phosphogypsum

Session

Civil Engineering, Infrastructure and Environment

Description

The mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology of fly ash and phosphogypsum vary depending on the region source, surface properties, and plant performance. However, very limited studies on the mineralogy and morphology of South African fly ash and phosphogypsum have been conducted. The present study comparatively investigates the particle morphology and mineralogical phase composition of South African fly ash (FA) and phosphogypsum (PG) in unary form. X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscope fitted with an Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (SEM-EDS) were used to examine the mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology. The findings show that the main mineral phases of the FA are mullite (Al4.68 Si1.2 O9.6) and quartz (SiO2), and that of PG is gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). Phosphogypsum has a well–defined rhombic and hexagonal dense crystalline structure while fly ash has smooth round and spherical-shaped glassy particles. The waste materials (FA and PG) are chemically reactive for use to produce cementitious products. This study discovers valuable metals and oxides in fly ash and phosphogypsum with potential benefits for sustainable construction applications.

Keywords:

Composite, microstructure, materials characterization, recycled waste, spectroscopy

Proceedings Editor

Edmond Hajrizi

ISBN

978-9951-550-95-6

Location

UBT Lipjan, Kosovo

Start Date

28-10-2023 8:00 AM

End Date

29-10-2023 6:00 PM

DOI

10.33107/ubt-ic.2023.364

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Oct 28th, 8:00 AM Oct 29th, 6:00 PM

Comparative study of the mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology of fly ash and phosphogypsum

UBT Lipjan, Kosovo

The mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology of fly ash and phosphogypsum vary depending on the region source, surface properties, and plant performance. However, very limited studies on the mineralogy and morphology of South African fly ash and phosphogypsum have been conducted. The present study comparatively investigates the particle morphology and mineralogical phase composition of South African fly ash (FA) and phosphogypsum (PG) in unary form. X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscope fitted with an Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (SEM-EDS) were used to examine the mineralogical phase composition and particle morphology. The findings show that the main mineral phases of the FA are mullite (Al4.68 Si1.2 O9.6) and quartz (SiO2), and that of PG is gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). Phosphogypsum has a well–defined rhombic and hexagonal dense crystalline structure while fly ash has smooth round and spherical-shaped glassy particles. The waste materials (FA and PG) are chemically reactive for use to produce cementitious products. This study discovers valuable metals and oxides in fly ash and phosphogypsum with potential benefits for sustainable construction applications.